https://socictopen.socict.org/files/original/96ff56aaebca69358cb075b9c4b74845.pdf 64127d3de8c0029d9fef7897a8394a03 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Agricultura sostenible Description An account of the resource Dominio científico: Agricultura sostenible Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource La confianza absoluta en la ciencia, o de cómo la geoingeniería sostiene la salvación del planeta/ The absolute trust in science, or how geoengineering holds the salvation of the planet Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Vera Sanoja Zerpa Description An account of the resource La intención de este trabajo es hacer una aproximación conceptual entre la geoingeniería como tecnología y los vacíos que la ciencia deja de responder. Es por esto que nos encargaremos de estudiar las consecuencias socio-ecológicas que devienen de los paneles científicos de decisores en esta materia. Para ello, hablamos de la ciencia y la tecnología como la racionalidad dominante que no se ha pensado a sí misma, luego haremos una crítica a la narrativa hegemónica del Antropoceno y finalmente revisamos informes del Grupo Intergubernamental de Expertos sobre el Cambio Climático (IPCC por sus siglas en inglés) para aproximarnos discursivamente al fenómeno y señalar los visos ideológicos ocultos en el lenguaje científico. Abstract This paper offers a conceptual approach framework between geoengineering as technology and the “emptiness” in science as a form of knowledge. This is why we will study the socio-ecological consequences of the role of scientific panelists and decision-makers towards the geoengineering agenda. We would like to talk about science and technology as the dominant rationality that “doesn’t think itself”, then we will make a critique of the hegemonic narrative of the Anthropocene and finally revise some Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports as a way to study the discursive phenomena and point out some ideological interstices in the scientific language. Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2018 Subject The topic of the resource Ciencia y tecnología, Ciência Pós-Normal, Narrativas, antropoceno Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context 10.17141/letrasverdes.23.2018.2610 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived Letras Verdes: Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Socioambientales Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Sede Ecuador Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant Environmental sciences, Human ecology. Anthropogeography Relation A related resource <a href="http://revistas.flacsoandes.edu.ec/letrasverdes/article/view/2610" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">http://revistas.flacsoandes.edu.ec/letrasverdes/article/view/2610</a>